Comparison
Hellus keefir vs 2.5% kefīrs
Overall, Hellus keefir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hellus keefir | 2.5% kefīrs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hellus keefir has 20% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Hellus keefir
Milk, d vitamin, yeast
2.5% kefīrs
kefīrs (_piens_, tīrkultūra)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hellus keefir or 2.5% kefīrs?
Overall, Hellus keefir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2.5% kefīrs has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2.5% kefīrs has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.