Comparison
Kefyras 2.5% vs 2.5% kefīrs
Overall, Kefyras 2.5% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kefyras 2.5% | 2.5% kefīrs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kefyras 2.5% has 20% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Kefyras 2.5% has 17% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4.1 g).
- Only 2.5% kefīrs lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kefyras 2.5%
Not available.
2.5% kefīrs
kefīrs (_piens_, tīrkultūra)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kefyras 2.5% or 2.5% kefīrs?
Overall, Kefyras 2.5% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2.5% kefīrs has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kefyras 2.5% has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.