Comparison
2.5% kefīrs vs Vilkyškių kefyras
Overall, Vilkyškių kefyras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2.5% kefīrs | Vilkyškių kefyras |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 51 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vilkyškių kefyras has 15% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Vilkyškių kefyras has 20% less sugar (3.3 g vs 4.1 g).
Ingredients
2.5% kefīrs
kefīrs (_piens_, tīrkultūra)
Vilkyškių kefyras
Pienas, Gyvos kefyro bakterijos
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2.5% kefīrs or Vilkyškių kefyras?
Overall, Vilkyškių kefyras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2.5% kefīrs has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vilkyškių kefyras has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.