Comparison
Hell vs Wieselburger Bier
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hell | Wieselburger Bier |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wieselburger Bier has no fat, while Hell has 0.5 g.
- Hell has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Hell lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
Wieselburger Bier
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hell or Wieselburger Bier?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hell has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hell has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.