Comparison
Hell vs Bière sans Alcool
Overall, Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hell | Bière sans Alcool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bière sans Alcool has 46% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 39 kcal).
- Bière sans Alcool has no fat, while Hell has 0.5 g.
- Hell has no sugar, while Bière sans Alcool has 1.3 g.
- Hell has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
- Hell has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
Bière sans Alcool
AGUA, MALTA DE CEBADA, AROMA NATURAL EXTRACTO DE LÚPULO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hell or Bière sans Alcool?
Overall, Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bière sans Alcool has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hell has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.