Comparison
Hell vs Märzen
Overall, Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hell | Märzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Märzen has no fat, while Hell has 0.5 g.
- Hell has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Hell is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
Märzen
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen, Hopfenextrakt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hell or Märzen?
Overall, Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hell has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hell has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.