Hell vs Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free
Overall, Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hell | Liefmans fruitesse alcohol f... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 22 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Malt d'orge |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free has 44% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 39 kcal).
- Hell has no sugar, while Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free has 3.7 g.
- Hell has 80% more protein (1 g vs 0.2 g).
- Hell is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free lists: Malt d'orge.
Ingredients
Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free
Eau, 15% de fruits (cerise, framboise, myrtille, sureau, fraise), malt d'orge, sucre liquide, sirop de fructose-glucose, arôme, concentré de carotte noire, acidifiant: acide citrique, édulcorants: acésulfame-K et sucralose, houblon, antioxydant: acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hell or Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free?
Overall, Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Liefmans fruitesse alcohol free has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hell has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.