Haricots rouges vs Haricots façon chili
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots rouges | Haricots façon chili |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 4.6 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots façon chili has 14% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 95 kcal).
- Haricots rouges has 38% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Haricots rouges has 91% less sugar (0.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Haricots rouges has 28% more fiber (6.4 g vs 4.6 g).
- Haricots rouges has 32% more protein (7.8 g vs 5.3 g).
Ingredients
Haricots rouges
Haricots rouges, eau, sel, antioxydant: calcium disodium EDTA. Traces éventuelles de sulfites, de lupins et de soja.
Haricots façon chili
Haricots rouges secs trempés*¹ 33%, eau, tomates* 21,5% (purée de tomates*¹ mi-réduite 12,3%, pulpe de tomates*¹ 7,2%, double concentré de tomates*), légumes en morceaux* 11,2% (carottes*¹ 4,8%, oignons*, poivrons rouges*), maïs* 2,9%, huile de tournesol* desodorisée, sel marin, épices, purée d'ail*, jus de citron* concentré, plante aromatique*. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique ¹ Origine France (81% des ingrédients agricoles bio)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots rouges or Haricots façon chili?
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots façon chili has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots rouges has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.