Hamburguesa natural de vacuno vs Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno
Overall, Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Hamburguesa natural de vacuno
Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburguesa natural de vacun... | Hamburguesa de lomo de vacun... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 213 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.5 g | 8.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has 11% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has 17% less fat (15 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Hamburguesa natural de vacuno
Not available.
Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno
Carne de vacuno seleccionada (98,5%), sal, antioxidantes (E-301 y E-331), aroma, especias y extractos vegetales.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburguesa natural de vacuno or Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno?
Overall, Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.