100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties vs Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno
Overall, 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties
Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties | Hamburguesa de lomo de vacun... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 252 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 19.9 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.3 g | 8.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 17.2 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has 11% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 8.2 g).
- 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has no sugar, while Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno has 0.5 g.
- 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has the better Nutri-Score.
- 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties
100% grass fed beef
Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno
Carne de vacuno seleccionada (98,5%), sal, antioxidantes (E-301 y E-331), aroma, especias y extractos vegetales.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties or Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno?
Overall, 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburguesa de lomo de vacuno has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.