Hamburger di scottona vs Saucisson hallal
Overall, Hamburger di scottona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburger di scottona | Saucisson hallal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 231 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.4 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger di scottona has 15% less fat (17 g vs 20 g).
- Hamburger di scottona has 66% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Hamburger di scottona has 35% more protein (17 g vs 11 g).
- Hamburger di scottona has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hamburger di scottona
Not available.
Saucisson hallal
e450 e451 e301 e331 proteínas de soja e325 e621 agua e262 e250 jarabe de soja grasa de vaca pollo e301 e150c jarabe de glucosa almidón de maiz carne de pollo almidón de trigo almidón de patata salchicha cocinada trigo estabilizador
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburger di scottona or Saucisson hallal?
Overall, Hamburger di scottona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger di scottona has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburger di scottona has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.