Comparison

Hamburger di scottona vs Bistecchine di pollo

Overall, Bistecchine di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Hamburger di scottona	Bistecchine di pollo
Nutri-Score	d	a
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	231 kcal	140 kcal
Fat	17 g	7 g
Saturated fat	7.4 g	2 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0.8 g	0 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	17 g	23 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Bistecchine di pollo has 39% fewer calories (140 kcal vs 231 kcal).
Bistecchine di pollo has 59% less fat (7 g vs 17 g).
Bistecchine di pollo has 73% less saturated fat (2 g vs 7.4 g).
Bistecchine di pollo has no salt, while Hamburger di scottona has 0.8 g.
Bistecchine di pollo has 26% more protein (23 g vs 17 g).
Bistecchine di pollo has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Hamburger di scottona

Not available.

Bistecchine di pollo

Sovracosce di pollo disossate

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hamburger di scottona or Bistecchine di pollo?

Overall, Bistecchine di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bistecchine di pollo has fewer calories: 140 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hamburger di scottona has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Hamburger di scottona vs Saucisson hallal Hamburger di scottona vs Hamburger formaggio e sp... Hamburger di scottona vs Salam ardelenesc Bistecchine di pollo vs Salam ardelenesc Hamburger di scottona vs Straccetti con rosmarino Hamburger di scottona vs Tagliata filetto al rosm... Hamburger di scottona vs Fettine sottilissime tac... Bistecchine di pollo vs Saucisson hallal