Hamburger di scottona vs Salam ardelenesc
Overall, Hamburger di scottona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburger di scottona | Salam ardelenesc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 231 kcal | 466 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 43 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.4 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 3.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger di scottona has 50% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 466 kcal).
- Hamburger di scottona has 60% less fat (17 g vs 43 g).
- Hamburger di scottona has 54% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 16 g).
- Hamburger di scottona has no sugar, while Salam ardelenesc has 0.5 g.
- Hamburger di scottona has 77% less salt (0.8 g vs 3.7 g).
- Hamburger di scottona has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hamburger di scottona
Not available.
Salam ardelenesc
Carne de porc, slǎnină, sare, condimente, boia de ardei iute, boia de ardei dulce, dextroză, antioxidant: ascorbat de sodiu, pudră de sfeclă roşie, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; cultură starter
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburger di scottona or Salam ardelenesc?
Overall, Hamburger di scottona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger di scottona has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburger di scottona has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.