Comparison

Grüne Bohnen-Eintopf vs Linseneintopf

Overall, Linseneintopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGrüne Bohnen-EintopfLinseneintopf
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 42 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.8 g 1 g
Salt 0.9 g 1 g
Fiber 0.9 g 2.8 g
Protein 1.9 g 3.2 g
Additives31
AllergensGlutenCelery, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Grüne Bohnen-Eintopf has 34% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 64 kcal).
  • Linseneintopf has 27% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Linseneintopf has 44% less sugar (1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Linseneintopf has 68% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Linseneintopf has 41% more protein (3.2 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Only Linseneintopf lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Grüne Bohnen-Eintopf

Wasser, 24 % grüne Bohnen, Kartoffeln, (Kartoffeln, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriummetabisulfit), 7,4 % Möhren, 3,5 % Kasseler Würfel aus Schulter und Schinken (Schweinefleisch, Wasser, Salz, getrockneter Glukosesirup, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Aroma, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Rapsöl, Rauch), Rapsöl, Salz, Zucker, Weizenmehl (Gluten), Aromen, Zwiebelpulver, Bohnenkraut,

Linseneintopf

Wasser, Linsen 30 %, Kartoffeln, Karotten, Zwiebeln, Tomatenmark, Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl, Stärke, _Weizenmehl_, Verdickungsmittel Guarkernmehl, Rohrohrzucker, Apfelessig, Gewürze (enthalten _Sellerie_), Kräuter.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Grüne Bohnen-Eintopf or Linseneintopf?

Overall, Linseneintopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Grüne Bohnen-Eintopf has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Linseneintopf has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons