Greek Halkidiki Garlic & Jalapeño Double Stuffed Olives vs Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver
Overall, Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Greek Halkidiki Garlic & Jalapeño Double Stuffed Olives
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Greek Halkidiki Garlic & Jal... | Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 14.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has 19% fewer calories (144 kcal vs 177 kcal).
- Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has 21% less fat (14.3 g vs 18 g).
- Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has 34% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.1 g).
Ingredients
Greek Halkidiki Garlic & Jalapeño Double Stuffed Olives
Halkidiki olives (77%), salt, rapeseed oil, jalapeño peppers (5%) garlic (4%), acidity regulators (lactic acid, acetic acid, citric acid), parsley, chilli flakes, firming agent (calcium chloride)
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver
Gröna oliver, vatten, salt, surhetsreglerande medel (mjölksyra).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Greek Halkidiki Garlic & Jalapeño Double Stuffed Olives or Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver?
Overall, Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.