Comparison
Great Northerns vs Alubia blanca
Overall, Great Northerns has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Great Northerns | Alubia blanca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 170 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 19 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Great Northerns has 42% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 292 kcal).
- Great Northerns has 76% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Great Northerns has no saturated fat, while Alubia blanca has 0.3 g.
- Great Northerns has 81% less sugar (1 g vs 5.3 g).
- Alubia blanca has 47% more fiber (19 g vs 10 g).
- Alubia blanca has 48% more protein (21 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Great Northerns
GREAT NORTHERNS
Alubia blanca
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Great Northerns or Alubia blanca?
Overall, Great Northerns has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Great Northerns has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Great Northerns has less sugar: 1 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.