Comparison

Góralki orzechove vs Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret

Overall, Góralki orzechove has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGóralki orzechoveHoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 552 kcal 497 kcal
Fat 33 g 23 g
Saturated fat 19 g 22 g
Sugars 35 g 29 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.6 g
Fiber 5 g 3.6 g
Protein 7 g 7.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret has 30% less fat (23 g vs 33 g).
  • Góralki orzechove has 14% less saturated fat (19 g vs 22 g).
  • Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret has 17% less sugar (29 g vs 35 g).
  • Góralki orzechove has 67% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Góralki orzechove has 28% more fiber (5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Only Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Góralki orzechove

Not available.

Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret

Kakaolu krema %73 [glukoz şurubu, Hindistan cevizi yağı, şeker, yağsız _süt_ tozu, yağı azaltılmış kakao tozu %6,8, emülgatörler (ayçiçek lesitini, poligliserol polirisinolat), aroma verici, tuz], gofret yaprağı %27 [_buğday_ unu (_gluten_ içerir), yağı azaltılmış kakao tozu %3,5, patates nişastası, emülgatör (ayçiçek lesitini), tuz, Hindistan cevizi yağı, kabartıcılar (sodyum hidrojen karbonat, sodyum asit pirofosfat, amonyum hidrojen karbonat), maya ekstraktı].

FAQ

Which is healthier: Góralki orzechove or Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret?

Overall, Góralki orzechove has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret has fewer calories: 497 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hoşbeş Kakao Kremalı Gofret has less sugar: 29 g versus 35 g per 100 g.

More comparisons