Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt vs Girolles
Overall, Girolles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Girolles des bois cueillies... | Girolles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 22 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Girolles has 67% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt has 65% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Girolles has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt has 54% more fiber (3.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Girolles has 45% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Girolles is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt
Girolles, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique. Champignons préparés par le procédé de présaumurage. Conditionné en France à partir de champignons ne provenant pas de France.
Girolles
Girolles.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt or Girolles?
Overall, Girolles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Girolles des bois cueillies en forêt has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.