Comparison

GINGEMBRE moulu vs CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*

Overall, CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGINGEMBRE mouluCURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COO...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 335 kcal 291 kcal
Fat 4.2 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 1.8 g
Sugars 3.4 g 3.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 14.1 g 22.7 g
Protein 9 g 9.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 13% fewer calories (291 kcal vs 335 kcal).
  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 23% less fat (3.3 g vs 4.2 g).
  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 29% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 2.6 g).
  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 38% more fiber (22.7 g vs 14.1 g).

Ingredients

GINGEMBRE moulu

Gingembre moulu

CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*

Curcuma moulu

FAQ

Which is healthier: GINGEMBRE moulu or CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*?

Overall, CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons