CURCUMA moulu vs CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*
Overall, CURCUMA moulu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | CURCUMA moulu | CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COO... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 22.7 g | 22.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- CURCUMA moulu has no calories, while CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 291 kcal.
- CURCUMA moulu has no fat, while CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 3.3 g.
- CURCUMA moulu has no saturated fat, while CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 1.8 g.
- CURCUMA moulu has no sugar, while CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 3.2 g.
- CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 100% more protein (9.7 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
CURCUMA moulu
Curcuma moulu
CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*
Curcuma moulu
FAQ
Which is healthier: CURCUMA moulu or CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*?
Overall, CURCUMA moulu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
CURCUMA moulu has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
CURCUMA moulu has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.