MUSCADE moulue vs CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*
Overall, CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | MUSCADE moulue | CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COO... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 504 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 36.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 25.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 20.8 g | 22.7 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 42% fewer calories (291 kcal vs 504 kcal).
- CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 91% less fat (3.3 g vs 36.3 g).
- CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 93% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 25.9 g).
- CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 45% more protein (9.7 g vs 5.3 g).
Ingredients
MUSCADE moulue
Muscade moulue
CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*
Curcuma moulu
FAQ
Which is healthier: MUSCADE moulue or CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*?
Overall, CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 504 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
MUSCADE moulue has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.