Comparison

MUSCADE moulue vs CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*

Overall, CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMUSCADE moulueCURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COO...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 504 kcal 291 kcal
Fat 36.3 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 25.9 g 1.8 g
Sugars 3 g 3.2 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 20.8 g 22.7 g
Protein 5.3 g 9.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 42% fewer calories (291 kcal vs 504 kcal).
  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 91% less fat (3.3 g vs 36.3 g).
  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 93% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 25.9 g).
  • CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has 45% more protein (9.7 g vs 5.3 g).

Ingredients

MUSCADE moulue

Muscade moulue

CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*

Curcuma moulu

FAQ

Which is healthier: MUSCADE moulue or CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g*?

Overall, CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

CURCUMA moulu PETIT PET "COOK" 80g* has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 504 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

MUSCADE moulue has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons