Garofalo Casarecce integrali vs Pâtes complètes
Overall, Garofalo Casarecce integrali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garofalo Casarecce integrali | Pâtes complètes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garofalo Casarecce integrali has 20% less fat (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Garofalo Casarecce integrali has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Garofalo Casarecce integrali
Semola integrale biologica di grano duro. Può contenere: soia e senape.
Pâtes complètes
Semola integrale di grano duro, acqua. Paese di coltivazione del grano: Italia. Paese di molitura: Italia.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garofalo Casarecce integrali or Pâtes complètes?
Overall, Garofalo Casarecce integrali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pâtes complètes has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garofalo Casarecce integrali has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.