Garam Masala vs Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp
Overall, Garam Masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Garam Masala
Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garam Masala | Old El Paso Chili Con Carne... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 271 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 24.2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 20.5 g |
| Fiber | 33.4 g | 10.4 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp has 23% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 354 kcal).
- Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp has 70% less fat (4.5 g vs 15 g).
- Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp has 77% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Garam Masala has 95% less sugar (1.2 g vs 24.2 g).
- Garam Masala has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 20.5 g).
- Garam Masala has 69% more fiber (33.4 g vs 10.4 g).
- Garam Masala has 50% more protein (14 g vs 7 g).
- Garam Masala is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Garam Masala
Graine de coriandre (49 %), poivre noir, piment de la Jamaïque, cumin (6%) cardamome (6%), curcuma, muscade, gingembre, girofle, laurier, cannelle, poudre de chili (piment, cumin, sel, origan, ail), piment de Cayenne
Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp
Spices (paprika, cumin, chili pepper, black pepper, cayenne pepper) (23%), salt, wheat flour, dextrose, wheat starch, dried onions, chicory extract, garlic powder, acidity regulator (citric acid), anti-caking agent (tricalcium phosphate), spice extract (paprika), oregano, flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garam Masala or Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp?
Overall, Garam Masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Old El Paso Chili Con Carne Seasoning Mix imp has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garam Masala has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 24.2 g per 100 g.