Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40 vs Gambas
Overall, Gambas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gambas ASC cuites entières 3... | Gambas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 84 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 18.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gambas has 12% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 95 kcal).
- Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40 has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Gambas has no salt, while Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40 has 2.1 g.
- Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40 has 14% more protein (22 g vs 18.9 g).
- Gambas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40
_Crevettes_ (Penaeus vannamei), sel, antioxydant: _disulfite_ de sodium, acidifiant: acide citrique
Gambas
Crevettes, sel, conservateur : E202, antioxydant : E223 (sulfites), acidifiant : E330.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40 or Gambas?
Overall, Gambas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gambas has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gambas ASC cuites entières 30/40 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.