Comparison
Fusilli vs Fusilli
Overall, Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusilli | Fusilli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 11.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilli has 92% less fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Fusilli has no saturated fat, while Fusilli has 0.5 g.
- Fusilli has no sugar, while Fusilli has 3 g.
- Fusilli has 14% more protein (13 g vs 11.2 g).
- Only Fusilli lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Fusilli
_Hartweizengrieß_, Wasser
Fusilli
unp op e 1
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusilli or Fusilli?
Overall, Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fusilli has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.