Comparison

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage vs Chicken Frankfurters

Overall, Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFully Cooked Chicken SausageChicken Frankfurters
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 85 kcal 272 kcal
Fat 5 g 24 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 8.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0.2 g
Protein 10 g 12.5 g
Additives03
AllergensChickenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 69% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 272 kcal).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 79% less fat (5 g vs 24 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 82% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 97% less sugar (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 48% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Chicken Frankfurters has 20% more protein (12.5 g vs 10 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage lists: Chicken.

Ingredients

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage

CHICKEN, WATER, SEA SALT, SPICES, LEMON PEEL POWDER, DRIED PARSLEY

Chicken Frankfurters

msm chicken 75%, water, chicken fat with skin, curing salt (salt, preservative (sodium nitrite)), spices, dextrose, distilled vinegar, spice extracts, stabiliser (diphosphates), antioxidant (ascorbic acid),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage or Chicken Frankfurters?

Overall, Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 272 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons