Comparison

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage vs Knacks pure poulet

Overall, Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFully Cooked Chicken SausageKnacks pure poulet
Nutri-Score — d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 85 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 5 g 14 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 5.3 g
Sugars 0 g 1.3 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0.7 g
Protein 10 g 11 g
Additives02
AllergensChickenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 54% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 186 kcal).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 64% less fat (5 g vs 14 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 72% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 98% less sugar (0 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has 51% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Knacks pure poulet has 91% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage lists: Chicken.

Ingredients

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage

CHICKEN, WATER, SEA SALT, SPICES, LEMON PEEL POWDER, DRIED PARSLEY

Knacks pure poulet

Viande de poulet 72%, eau, peau de poulet, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, extraits d'épices, épices, arômes, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Viande de poulet origine Union Européenne.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage or Knacks pure poulet?

Overall, Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fully Cooked Chicken Sausage has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons