Comparison
Fulet de cabillaud vs Fina filéer av Torskfilé
Overall, Fina filéer av Torskfilé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fulet de cabillaud | Fina filéer av Torskfilé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fina filéer av Torskfilé has no sugar, while Fulet de cabillaud has 0.5 g.
- Only Fina filéer av Torskfilé lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Fulet de cabillaud
Not available.
Fina filéer av Torskfilé
Cod (Gadus morhua)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fulet de cabillaud or Fina filéer av Torskfilé?
Overall, Fina filéer av Torskfilé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fulet de cabillaud has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fina filéer av Torskfilé has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.