Comparison
Filet de cabillaud vs Fulet de cabillaud
Overall, Filet de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de cabillaud | Fulet de cabillaud |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de cabillaud has no sugar, while Fulet de cabillaud has 0.5 g.
- Filet de cabillaud has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Filet de cabillaud
Not available.
Fulet de cabillaud
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de cabillaud or Fulet de cabillaud?
Overall, Filet de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fulet de cabillaud has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de cabillaud has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.