Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod vs Filet de cabillaud
Overall, Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Caught Alaska Pacific C... | Filet de cabillaud |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod has no fat, while Filet de cabillaud has 0.6 g.
- Only Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod
Pacific Cod (Gadus macrocephalus). CONTAINS: Pacific Cod (Fish).
Filet de cabillaud
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod or Filet de cabillaud?
Overall, Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Caught Alaska Pacific Cod has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.