Comparison
Fulet de cabillaud vs Torskeporsjoner Naturell
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fulet de cabillaud | Torskeporsjoner Naturell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fulet de cabillaud has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Torskeporsjoner Naturell has no sugar, while Fulet de cabillaud has 0.5 g.
- Only Torskeporsjoner Naturell lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Fulet de cabillaud
Not available.
Torskeporsjoner Naturell
Torskefilet (Gadus morhua).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fulet de cabillaud or Torskeporsjoner Naturell?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fulet de cabillaud has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Torskeporsjoner Naturell has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.