Fuet vs Argal Fuet Iberico
Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fuet | Argal Fuet Iberico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 421 kcal | 458 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 27.5 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fuet has 11% less fat (34 g vs 38 g).
- Fuet has 11% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 15 g).
- Fuet has 30% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Only Fuet lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fuet
fuet extra the original rrradellas ingredients: shoulder, bacon, ham and lean pork, salt, lactose (milk), spices, antioxidant (sodium ascorbate), preservative (potassium nitrate), product subjected to desiccation, guaranteed without dyes, natural edible casing 出出 nutritional information in 100g: energy value: 1749 kl / 421 ka fats: 34,0 g, of which saturated: 13,3 g, carbon hydrates •espetec, 14g,of which sugars: 1,4 g, proteins: 27,5 g, salt: 3,5 9 casa tarradellas, s,a, n-152,km 70-cp 08503 www,cosatarradellas,es gluten free preferably consume before/lot: see container, selection charcuterie
Argal Fuet Iberico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fuet or Argal Fuet Iberico?
Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fuet has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fuet has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.