Comparison
Frytki vs Frytki karbawone
Overall, Frytki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frytki | Frytki karbawone |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 23.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frytki has 41% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 273 kcal).
- Frytki has 77% less fat (5.5 g vs 23.8 g).
- Frytki has 85% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Frytki has 40% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Frytki has 43% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Frytki has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Frytki
Not available.
Frytki karbawone
ziemniaki 95%, olej słonecznikowy 4,5%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frytki or Frytki karbawone?
Overall, Frytki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frytki has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frytki has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.