Fruits Confits assortis vs Citrons Confits
Overall, Citrons Confits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Fruits Confits assortis
Citrons Confits
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruits Confits assortis | Citrons Confits |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 290 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 68 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Citrons Confits has 89% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 290 kcal).
- Citrons Confits has 99% less sugar (1 g vs 68 g).
- Fruits Confits assortis has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.3 g).
- Citrons Confits has 31% more fiber (4.9 g vs 3.4 g).
- Citrons Confits has 100% more protein (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- Citrons Confits has the better Nutri-Score.
- Citrons Confits is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Citrons Confits lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Fruits Confits assortis
Fruits (52%) (cerises bigarreaux entières, orange en tranches, lamelles de citron), sirop de glucose-fructose, sucre, jus concentré de carotte et d'aronia, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.
Citrons Confits
Citron, eau, sel, acidifiant: acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateurs: dioxyde de soufre, benzoate de sodium
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruits Confits assortis or Citrons Confits?
Overall, Citrons Confits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Citrons Confits has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 290 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Citrons Confits has less sugar: 1 g versus 68 g per 100 g.