Froot loops vs Epifin
Overall, Epifin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Froot loops | Epifin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Froot loops has 94% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Epifin has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Epifin has no saturated fat, while Froot loops has 0.5 g.
- Epifin has no sugar, while Froot loops has 12 g.
- Epifin has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Froot loops has 90% more protein (2 g vs 0.2 g).
- Only Epifin lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Froot loops
Not available.
Epifin
Butter od. margarine, Zucker, Dr. Oetker Vanillin-Zucker, Dr. Oetker Zitronen - oder Rumaroma, Prise Salz, Eier, Mehl, Dr. Oetker Epifin, gestr. TL Dr. Oetker Backpulver
FAQ
Which is healthier: Froot loops or Epifin?
Overall, Epifin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Froot loops has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Epifin has less sugar: 0 g versus 12 g per 100 g.