Comparison

Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose vs Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO

Overall, Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFromage frais (tartiner et c...Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 199 kcal 329 kcal
Fat 16.7 g 24 g
Saturated fat 10.7 g 14 g
Sugars 3 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 8.7 g 27 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose has 40% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 329 kcal).
  • Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose has 30% less fat (16.7 g vs 24 g).
  • Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose has 24% less saturated fat (10.7 g vs 14 g).
  • Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has no sugar, while Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose has 3 g.
  • Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has no salt, while Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose has 0.8 g.
  • Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has 68% more protein (27 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose

buttermilk, cream, salt, lactic ferments

Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO

Pastöroitu maito, suola, hapate.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose or Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO?

Overall, Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fromage frais (tartiner et cuisiner) zéro lactose has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 329 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hyvä suomalainen ARKIJUUSTO has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons