Comparison

Fromage fondu aux noix vs Rambol Croquant & Fondant

Overall, Fromage fondu aux noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFromage fondu aux noixRambol Croquant & Fondant
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 406 kcal 322 kcal
Fat 34 g 30 g
Saturated fat 0 g 12.7 g
Sugars 0 g 1.5 g
Salt 2 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 22 g 12 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedCelery, Milk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 21% fewer calories (322 kcal vs 406 kcal).
  • Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 12% less fat (30 g vs 34 g).
  • Fromage fondu aux noix has no saturated fat, while Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 12.7 g.
  • Fromage fondu aux noix has no sugar, while Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 1.5 g.
  • Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 30% less salt (1.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Fromage fondu aux noix has 45% more protein (22 g vs 12 g).
  • Fromage fondu aux noix has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rambol Croquant & Fondant lists: Celery, Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Fromage fondu aux noix

Not available.

Rambol Croquant & Fondant

_Fromage_ blanc (45%), eau, fruits à coque 10% (dont noix 6%), _beurre_, protéines de _lait_, poudre de _lait_ écrémé, sels de fonte : E452, E450, amidon transformé de manioc, sel, épaississants : carraghénanes, agar agar, arôme (_céleri_), correcteur d'acidité : acide lactique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fromage fondu aux noix or Rambol Croquant & Fondant?

Overall, Fromage fondu aux noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rambol Croquant & Fondant has fewer calories: 322 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fromage fondu aux noix has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons