Fromage fondu aux noix vs Rambol Croquant & Fondant
Overall, Rambol Croquant & Fondant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fromage fondu aux noix | Rambol Croquant & Fondant |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 406 kcal | 322 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 34 g | 12.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 21% fewer calories (322 kcal vs 406 kcal).
- Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 12% less fat (30 g vs 34 g).
- Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 63% less saturated fat (12.7 g vs 34 g).
- Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 50% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Rambol Croquant & Fondant has 30% less salt (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Fromage fondu aux noix has 45% more protein (22 g vs 12 g).
- Only Rambol Croquant & Fondant lists: Celery, Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Fromage fondu aux noix
Not available.
Rambol Croquant & Fondant
_Fromage_ blanc (45%), eau, fruits à coque 10% (dont noix 6%), _beurre_, protéines de _lait_, poudre de _lait_ écrémé, sels de fonte : E452, E450, amidon transformé de manioc, sel, épaississants : carraghénanes, agar agar, arôme (_céleri_), correcteur d'acidité : acide lactique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fromage fondu aux noix or Rambol Croquant & Fondant?
Overall, Rambol Croquant & Fondant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rambol Croquant & Fondant has fewer calories: 322 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rambol Croquant & Fondant has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.