Comparison

Frites de poulet panées vs Slow Roasted Chicken Bites

Overall, Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFrites de poulet panéesSlow Roasted Chicken Bites
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 251 kcal 209 kcal
Fat 15 g 11 g
Saturated fat 3 g 2.1 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0.9 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 13 g 21 g
Additives06
AllergensGlutenGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has 17% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 251 kcal).
  • Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has 27% less fat (11 g vs 15 g).
  • Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has 30% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3 g).
  • Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has 53% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Frites de poulet panées has 27% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has 38% more protein (21 g vs 13 g).
  • Frites de poulet panées has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Slow Roasted Chicken Bites lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Frites de poulet panées

(à la mise en oeuvre) : Viande de volaille traitée en salaison origine France : 79%(viande de poulet : 44%, viande de dinde : 15%), eau, fibres de BLÉ, dextrose de blé, sel, arôme naturel de poivre, panure : 21% (eau, farine de BLÉ, amidon de maïs, GLUTEN de BLÉ, morceaux de pomme de terre déshydratés, fibre de pomme de terre, sel, épices, arômes, levure), . Huile de tournesol. Peut contenir des traces de lait.

Slow Roasted Chicken Bites

chicken breast (91%), vegetable oils (soya bean, sunflower, rapeseed), seasoning (salt, yeast extract, onion, garlic, sage, stabiliser: sodium tripolyphosphate, natural flavouring), rusk (wheat flour, (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), salt, raising agent ammonium bicarbonate), modified tapioca starch, dextrose

FAQ

Which is healthier: Frites de poulet panées or Slow Roasted Chicken Bites?

Overall, Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 251 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Slow Roasted Chicken Bites has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons