Fransk leverpostej vs Økologisk Leverpostej
Overall, Fransk leverpostej has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fransk leverpostej | Økologisk Leverpostej |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 282 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.3 g | 8.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fransk leverpostej has 37% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 282 kcal).
- Fransk leverpostej has 54% less fat (11 g vs 24 g).
- Fransk leverpostej has 51% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 8.8 g).
- Økologisk Leverpostej has 51% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Fransk leverpostej has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Fransk leverpostej has 23% more protein (12 g vs 9.2 g).
- Økologisk Leverpostej is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fransk leverpostej lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Fransk leverpostej
Griselever (34%), vand, grisespæk, hvedemel, skummetmælkspulver, løg, salt, sukker, gærekstrakt, ansjoser, krydderier og krydderurter, maltodextrin, krydderiekstrakter, konserveringsmidde!: Sorbinsyre, antioxidant: Natriumascorbat.
Økologisk Leverpostej
Griselever 32%, spæk af gris 32%, laktosefri minimalk, vand, kartoffelmel, salt, tørret løg, krydderier
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fransk leverpostej or Økologisk Leverpostej?
Overall, Fransk leverpostej has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fransk leverpostej has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 282 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Økologisk Leverpostej has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.