Francfort vs Pork sausages
Overall, Pork sausages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Francfort | Pork sausages |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 276 kcal | 217 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.9 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 9 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork sausages has 21% fewer calories (217 kcal vs 276 kcal).
- Pork sausages has 32% less fat (17 g vs 25 g).
- Pork sausages has 12% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 8.9 g).
- Pork sausages has 33% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pork sausages has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Pork sausages has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
- Pork sausages has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Francfort lists: Gluten.
- Only Pork sausages lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Francfort
Viande de porc* 68%, eau, gras de porc*, sel, fibres de blé, plasma déshydraté, stabilisants: diphosphates et triphosphates; dextrose, arômes naturels, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, extraits d'épices, arôme de fumée, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Boyau coloré (collagène, eau, cellulose, colorants: curcumine, bixine de rocou). *Origine France.
Pork sausages
PORK, Water, Salt, GLUCOSE (GLUCOSE), Spices, ANIMAL PROTEIN, Flavourings, DRIED ACEROLA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Francfort or Pork sausages?
Overall, Pork sausages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pork sausages has fewer calories: 217 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Francfort has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.