Comparison

Framboise Passion vs Postre Soja Natural

Overall, Postre Soja Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFramboise PassionPostre Soja Natural
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 76 kcal 43 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.4 g
Sugars 9.4 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0.3 g
Protein 3.7 g 4.6 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Postre Soja Natural has 43% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 76 kcal).
  • Framboise Passion has 22% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Postre Soja Natural has no sugar, while Framboise Passion has 9.4 g.
  • Postre Soja Natural has 20% more protein (4.6 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Postre Soja Natural has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Postre Soja Natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Framboise Passion

Jus de soja* 78% (eau, graines de soja* 10,8%), sucre de canne non raffiné*, framboise* 7%, jus de fruit de la passion* 2%, amidon de tapioca, arôme naturel de passion*, arôme naturel de framboise*, épaississant : farine de graines de caroube*, ferments sélectionnés dont Bifidus et Lactobacillus acidophilus. *Issus de l'agriculture biologique. Source de protéines végétales. Naturellement sans gluten. Sans OGM.

Postre Soja Natural

Zumo de soja (99,5%) (agua, granos de soja (9%)), sales de calcio, vitamina D2, fermentos (Bifidus, Lactobacillus acidophilus). Sin OGM.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Framboise Passion or Postre Soja Natural?

Overall, Postre Soja Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Postre Soja Natural has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Postre Soja Natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons