Fortune cookies vs Fortune cookie
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fortune cookies | Fortune cookie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 403 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 41 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune cookies has 70% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Fortune cookies has 50% less fat (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Fortune cookies has 71% less sugar (12 g vs 41 g).
- Fortune cookie has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Fortune cookies has 50% more protein (2 g vs 1 g).
- Fortune cookies has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fortune cookies
Not available.
Fortune cookie
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fortune cookies or Fortune cookie?
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune cookies has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune cookies has less sugar: 12 g versus 41 g per 100 g.