Fortune cookie vs Fortune Cookies
Overall, Fortune cookie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fortune cookie | Fortune Cookies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 403 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 4.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 42.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune cookie has 29% less fat (3 g vs 4.2 g).
- Fortune cookie has 75% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Fortune Cookies has 84% more protein (6.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Fortune cookie
Not available.
Fortune Cookies
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fortune cookie or Fortune Cookies?
Overall, Fortune cookie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune cookie has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune cookie has less sugar: 41 g versus 42.8 g per 100 g.