Flash Wondermint Gum vs Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic
Overall, Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flash Wondermint Gum | Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Ma... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 5 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic has 12% fewer calories (264 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic has no sugar, while Flash Wondermint Gum has 66 g.
- Only Flash Wondermint Gum lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Flash Wondermint Gum
Sugar, gum base, glucose syrup, flavours, humectant (glycerin), emulsifier (soy lecithin), sweetener (sucralose).
Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic
Ağızda çiğnenmek üzere, tatlandırıcılar (sorbitol, maltitol, aspartam, asesülfam K), sakız bazı, nem verici (gliserin), aroma vericiler, topaklanmayı önleyici (magnezyum tuzları), renklendirici (titanyum dioksit), antioksidan (butil hidroksi toluen).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flash Wondermint Gum or Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic?
Overall, Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chewing-gum HyperBon goût Mastic has less sugar: 0 g versus 66 g per 100 g.