Comparison
Flan coco vs Bande flan coco
Overall, Bande flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flan coco | Bande flan coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.6 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flan coco has 12% less fat (7.6 g vs 8.6 g).
- Bande flan coco has 34% less saturated fat (5 g vs 7.6 g).
- Bande flan coco has 11% less sugar (16 g vs 18 g).
- Bande flan coco has 18% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Flan coco
Not available.
Bande flan coco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flan coco or Bande flan coco?
Overall, Bande flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bande flan coco has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bande flan coco has less sugar: 16 g versus 18 g per 100 g.