Comparison

Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel vs Ideal Flan Vanilla

Overall, Ideal Flan Vanilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlan bio à la vanille nappé...Ideal Flan Vanilla
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 114 kcal 50 kcal
Fat 3 g 0 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0 g
Sugars 17.4 g 12 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 3.2 g 0 g
Additives32
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ideal Flan Vanilla has 56% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 114 kcal).
  • Ideal Flan Vanilla has no fat, while Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel has 3 g.
  • Ideal Flan Vanilla has no saturated fat, while Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel has 2.1 g.
  • Ideal Flan Vanilla has 31% less sugar (12 g vs 17.4 g).
  • Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel has 100% more protein (3.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel

LAIT entier équitable (80,7%), caramel équitable (9%) (sucre de canne*, eau, amidon", épaississant (gomme xanthane)), sucre de canne* équitable (6,4%), poudre de LAIT écrémé, amidon*, crème* équitable (LAT), gélifiant (carraghénane), correcteur d'acidité (citrates de sodium), arôme naturel de vanille.

Ideal Flan Vanilla

Sucre, gélifiant: carraghenane, amidon de mais, arôme vanille, colorants: (Tartrazine, Joune soleil FCF).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flan bio à la vanille nappé de caramel or Ideal Flan Vanilla?

Overall, Ideal Flan Vanilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ideal Flan Vanilla has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ideal Flan Vanilla has less sugar: 12 g versus 17.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons