Comparison

Fitness Water Watermelon vs Liquid Iv

Overall, Fitness Water Watermelon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFitness Water WatermelonLiquid Iv
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 0 kcal 281 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 68.8 g
Salt 21.9 g 7.8 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives74
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fitness Water Watermelon has no calories, while Liquid Iv has 281 kcal.
  • Fitness Water Watermelon has no sugar, while Liquid Iv has 68.8 g.
  • Liquid Iv has 64% less salt (7.8 g vs 21.9 g).
  • Only Fitness Water Watermelon lists: None.

Ingredients

Fitness Water Watermelon

Citric acid, salt, sodium citrate, maltodextrin, monopotassium phosphate, ascorbic acid (vitamin c), sucralose, natural flavor, silicon dioxide, niacinamide (vitamin b3), acesulfame potassium, calcium disodium edta (to protect flavor), calcium pantothenate (vitamin b5), vitamin e acetate, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin b6), cyanocobalamin (vitamin b12).

Liquid Iv

CANE SUGAR, DEXTROSE, CITRIC ACID, SALT, POTASSIUM CITRATE, SODIUM CITRATE, DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, SILICON DIOXIDE, STEVIA LEAF EXTRACT (REBAUDIOSIDE A), VITAMIN C (ASCORBIC ACID), NATURAL FLAVORS, VITAMIN B3 (NIACINAMIDE), VITAMIN B5 (CALCIUM D-PANTOTHENATE), VITAMIN B6 (PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE), VITAMIN B12 (CYANOCOBALAMIN)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fitness Water Watermelon or Liquid Iv?

Overall, Fitness Water Watermelon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fitness Water Watermelon has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 281 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fitness Water Watermelon has less sugar: 0 g versus 68.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons