Comparison

Fischlis Knabbergebäck vs Cheesetastic

Overall, Cheesetastic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFischlis KnabbergebäckCheesetastic
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 421 kcal 408 kcal
Fat 11 g 20 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 4.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 11 g
Salt 4 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 11 g
Protein 11 g 15 g
Additives54
AllergensGlutenMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fischlis Knabbergebäck has 45% less fat (11 g vs 20 g).
  • Fischlis Knabbergebäck has 81% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Fischlis Knabbergebäck has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 11 g).
  • Cheesetastic has 63% less salt (1.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Cheesetastic has 27% more protein (15 g vs 11 g).
  • Cheesetastic has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Fischlis Knabbergebäck lists: Gluten.
  • Only Cheesetastic lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Fischlis Knabbergebäck

WEIZENMEHL, Rapsöl, Salz, Backtriebmittel (Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Dinatriumdiphosphat), WEIZENMALZ, Hefe, Säureregulator (Natriumhydroxid). Allergenhinweis: Kann Spuren von SESAM und MILCHBESTANDTEILEN enthalten.

Cheesetastic

Reismehl, Rapsöl, Buttermilchpulver, Süßungsmitlel: Erythrit, Kichererbsenmehl, Käsepulver (8,5 %), Feuchthaltemittel: Polydextrose, Magermilchpulver, Milchproteinkonzentrat, Inulin, Maltodextrin, Gewürze, Weizenstärke* Salz. Kokosfett, Emulgator: Lecithin (Soja), Käsearoma. *glutenfrei

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fischlis Knabbergebäck or Cheesetastic?

Overall, Cheesetastic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cheesetastic has fewer calories: 408 kcal versus 421 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fischlis Knabbergebäck has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons