Knabbergebäck mit Käsegeschmack vs Cheesetastic
Overall, Cheesetastic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Knabbergebäck mit Käsegeschm... | Cheesetastic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 532 kcal | 408 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 4.7 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 11 g |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cheesetastic has 23% fewer calories (408 kcal vs 532 kcal).
- Cheesetastic has 31% less fat (20 g vs 29 g).
- Cheesetastic has 64% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 13 g).
- Cheesetastic has 21% less sugar (11 g vs 14 g).
- Cheesetastic has 61% more protein (15 g vs 5.8 g).
- Cheesetastic has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cheesetastic lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Knabbergebäck mit Käsegeschmack
Not available.
Cheesetastic
Reismehl, Rapsöl, Buttermilchpulver, Süßungsmitlel: Erythrit, Kichererbsenmehl, Käsepulver (8,5 %), Feuchthaltemittel: Polydextrose, Magermilchpulver, Milchproteinkonzentrat, Inulin, Maltodextrin, Gewürze, Weizenstärke* Salz. Kokosfett, Emulgator: Lecithin (Soja), Käsearoma. *glutenfrei
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knabbergebäck mit Käsegeschmack or Cheesetastic?
Overall, Cheesetastic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cheesetastic has fewer calories: 408 kcal versus 532 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cheesetastic has less sugar: 11 g versus 14 g per 100 g.